Nirvana
- AresKenux
- New Trial Member
- Posts: 16
- Joined: July 19th, 2018, 1:33 pm
Nirvana
What do you think of it?
What do you know about it?
Can anyone attain it?
If attained, how is it sustained?
Is it vital to mental health?
If yes, then it what ways?
If no, then why not?
I myself, feel as though nirvana, is a universal concept. Attained in many various ways, depending on the personality and behavior of each individual.
I think it's about releasing and relinquishing the cares and worries of things that are not truly important, in order to recognize that which is wholly important. Such as variations of many healthy virtues. I feel as though it can be practical, once sustained in itself, to change the world for the better. By showing ourselves as examples of virtue, instead of just speaking or thinking it.
But I'd like to hear, your opinion on the topic, and would like to be corrected if I have misconstrued nirvana's definition.
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2837
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Nirvana
Ask of a concept, what is its nature? before asking how it is achieved and what effects it may have beyond itself. Nirvana is first and foremost a qualitative condition. What is this condition? Simple: happiness in the extreme. The getting there and the social consequences are quite beside the point, but it is so individually conceived, so essentially solitary, that they actually have a name for compassionate Buddhists to set them apart, which is Bodhisattva.
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: Nirvana
I guess I'm saying there are good and bad and fake ways of achieving happiness.
Also at what point does happiness become extreme. Wouldn't that be quite subjective?
- ThomasHobbes
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm
Re: Nirvana
1) Seems like a decent enough idea to keep people behaving better.
2) I know it is a human invention.
3) obviously not.
4) It is only sustained as an idea in the human community.
5) Since only a minority of sane people believe or follow this myth the answer is obvious enough.
6)
7) Since the existence of Nirvana is beyond any empirical verification, it is clear that the idea is pure invention since no human can have first hand knowledge of a future reward.
It's pointless trying to pretend the existence of a thing which can only be sustained by cultural myth.
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2837
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Nirvana
Yes, very subjective, absolutely so. What happens when you sit and meditate for hours, days, years. It's not about good deeds, though such things are compatible with nirvana in the same way, I would hazard, that Christian love is.Eduk:
Han, happiness in the extreme is not a simple concept, in my opinion. For example I could be happy holding my new born son, or winning the lottery, or my cancer going into remission, or smiting my foes, or conning someone, or chasing the dragon.
I guess I'm saying there are good and bad and fake ways of achieving happiness.
Also at what point does happiness become extreme. Wouldn't that be quite subjective?
Actually, I think happiness is a simple concept, though it does encompass many different kinds of engagements or indulgences. It is what i would call an abiding feeling of well being, one that has endurance. This pizza may taste good, the ride in my Lamborghini, yes, the one I don't have, smooth and luxurious, but aside from these physical pleasures, as I experience them, if there is an abiding sense that all is well, then I am happy, to some degree; if not, the taste, the ride, a very limited in their enjoyment. I love my daughter, my wife, and others, but what does this mean if not that when they are around or I think of them, I feel that same sense of well being. There is, granted, a difference in the contribution the things that make me happy provide, but essentially they are the same. I think happiness is not so qualitatively different, but the things we engage in are.
I ask this question: when we fall in love, whence comes this experience? The beloved does not literally give the love to the other, rather, they just show up and there you are head over heels. It is not what someone gives, it is rather produced within, and s/he is the catalyst. One way to think about nirvana, the reasonable way, I think, is to see this capacity to generate love within as what Buddhists try to realize independently, and they do this apart from the ways the world makes things complicated and messy, like finding out the one you love snores in bed, is a terrible parent and is a fool.
Interesting thing, romantic love: pure happiness while it lasts.
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Nirvana
The adage of “Be careful of what you wish for” springs immediately to mind when people talk of “bliss”, “nirvana” or other iterations of that “psychotic break”.
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2837
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Nirvana
- LuckyR
- Moderator
- Posts: 7935
- Joined: January 18th, 2015, 1:16 am
Re: Nirvana
True enough. It belongs in the same category with omnipotence, omniscience, perfection and other examples of the infinite which do not exist in reality.ThomasHobbes wrote: ↑August 30th, 2018, 5:18 am
1) Seems like a decent enough idea to keep people behaving better.
2) I know it is a human invention.
3) obviously not.
4) It is only sustained as an idea in the human community.
5) Since only a minority of sane people believe or follow this myth the answer is obvious enough.
6)
7) Since the existence of Nirvana is beyond any empirical verification, it is clear that the idea is pure invention since no human can have first hand knowledge of a future reward.
It's pointless trying to pretend the existence of a thing which can only be sustained by cultural myth.
- Burning ghost
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: February 27th, 2016, 3:10 am
Re: Nirvana
Dasein means zilch to me. You know that. Air tight? Bull ****Hereandnow wrote: ↑August 30th, 2018, 9:34 pm Well, there is some truth in this, BG. Imagine what it would take to entirely withdraw from people, form human dasein. On the other hand, I actually think the Buddhists are right, and far, far ahead of their time. The Buddhist argument is air tight if you look closely.
- ThomasHobbes
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: May 5th, 2018, 5:53 pm
Re: Nirvana
As tight as a duck's anus - and that's water-tight. But I'd give you more for a duck's a r s e than I would for the laughable reincarnation cycle.Hereandnow wrote: ↑August 30th, 2018, 9:34 pm . The Buddhist argument is air tight if you look closely.
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2837
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Nirvana
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: Nirvana
Clearly Wikipedia is just trolling Buddhists. Actually I think Wikipedia do rather explain Buddhism well hereAll Buddhist traditions share the goal of overcoming suffering and the cycle of death & rebirth, either by the attainment of Nirvana or through the path of Buddhahood
This tells you nothing other than Buddhists believe lots of different things for different reasons.Buddhism encompasses a variety of traditions, beliefs and spiritual practices largely based on original teachings attributed to the Buddha and resulting interpreted philosophies.
Perhaps Hereandnow you can save us regular folks from having trawl through sources and just link one which you feel best represents the 'real' Buddhism.
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2837
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Nirvana
-
- Posts: 2466
- Joined: December 8th, 2016, 7:08 am
- Favorite Philosopher: Socrates
Re: Nirvana
Because Zen is all made up so there is no underlying consistent reasonable methodology to explain? Special pleading always raises alarm bells with me.Eduk: not to be a cliche, but there is a very good reason the Zen master tosses that fan at the inquiring student.
- Hereandnow
- Posts: 2837
- Joined: July 11th, 2012, 9:16 pm
- Favorite Philosopher: the moon and the stars
Re: Nirvana
2023/2024 Philosophy Books of the Month
Mark Victor Hansen, Relentless: Wisdom Behind the Incomparable Chicken Soup for the Soul
by Mitzi Perdue
February 2023
Rediscovering the Wisdom of Human Nature: How Civilization Destroys Happiness
by Chet Shupe
March 2023